Here, we would like to continue our discussion on "Exchanging project geodata using IATI“. initiated during the BMZ- and KfW-hosted Conference “Fragile Contexts, Digitalisation, Remote Management, Monitoring and Verification” on 21.01.2021.
IATI Technical Team • 3 years ago Areas for conversation coming from the KfW include: We need greater take up of the location element. Can we streamline/standardise this part of the Standard? Can we standardise the Geographic Vocabulary list or recommend use of a particular vocabulary? Is there a way we can standardise town/village name that will also be accepted by the particular country? Suggestion to change the Geographic Location Reach codelist to include 'point', 'line', 'polygon' to better reflect the geo region covered. The Location Type codelist is too large and not development/humanitarian specific enough. Is there a better codelist we can use? Would a codelist like the Anderson Classification system be helpful? Total amount of likes 1 like Dislike 0
Areas for conversation coming from the KfW include:
Would a codelist like the Anderson Classification system be helpful?
Please log in or sign up to comment.